Thursday, March 21, 2019
The Government Should Respect Property Rights Essay -- Expository Exem
The Government Should Respect Property Rights Imagine youve been enjoying your backyard picnic add-in and chairs for the past 10 years when suddenly, for no apparent reason, you are served get hold from a government agency that you will be fined $6,000 a daylight unless you remove them.Or, imagine you would like to add a stone pass to your garden. You begin to research the procedure and costs, only to learn that a lengthy application will be required, with multiple hearings before a express commission. You find yourself embroiled in a Kafkaesque legal affair costing tens of thousands of dollars. Finally, after years of struggle the government demands, as a condition for approving your little walkway, that you donate a portion of your vote down to the accede.Do these sound like nightmarish stories out of some totalistic regime?Shockingly, they are normal, everyday incidents for prop owners across the nation.In California, for example, a state agency called the California Coa stal commissioning routinely tramples the property rights of coastal landowners. People residing within five miles inland of Californias 1,100 miles of coastline are subject to the commissions power to approve or deny improvements involving any solid structure on their property. This can imply adding a room to a home, planting trees, adding a fence or garden walkway and, yes, in one current Orange County case, a picnic table and chairs. Established in 1976, the California Coastal Commissions mandate is to preserve, protect . . . and restore the resources of the coastal zone for the merriment of the current and succeeding generations. The Commission operates on the premise that the roughly 1.5 cardinal acres under its jurisdiction are a... ...erty without permission from his tenant. Near San Francisco certain(a) homes designated as affordable can be sold for no much than a government-controlled price. In Portland there are wide swaths of the city in which one cannot build a si ngle-family home on ones own land, even if it is adjacent to other suburban homes. In hundreds of U.S. cities, mingled laws establishing historical districts, landmarks, or improvement zones straightjacket owners who are consequently unable(p) to remove trees, erect fences, add rooms, or even change precipitate gutters.Government boards, agencies and commissions with this kind of authority should be opposed not on a case-by-case basis, but on principle. The only proper state policy with respect to private property is hands off In America, no governmental agency should have the power to deprive an somebody of his property rights.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment