Ethics and Moral Reasoning Essay -- Morality/Ethics

Aristotles Virtue EthicsAristotle in his meritoriousness ethics states that a virtuous idiosyncratic is some nonp areilness with ideal traits. These characteristic traits normally get in from an individuals innate proclivity but should be cultivated. afterwards they are cultivated, these character traits supposedly become stable in an individual. moral consequentilaists and deontologists are normally concerned with universal doctrines that can be utilized in any situation that requires moral interpretation. Unlike these theorists, Aristotles virtue ethics are concerned with the general questions such as what is a proficient life, what are proper social and family values, and how should one live (Bejczy 32). Aristotle developed his virtue ethics based on leash central principles eudaimonia, ethics of care, and agent based theories. Eudaimonia stipulates that virtues can be seen in the way an individual flourishes flourishing under this concept refers to ones ability to perfo rm their puzzle outs with distinct accuracy (Bejczy 33).The distinct function of humans according to Aristotle is reasoning, and a worthy life is characterized by good reasoning. The agent based theory places emphasis on the fact that virtues are determined by common institutions people use to label traits in other people as admirable. According to Aristotles virtue ethics, a virtue like soundy does not necessarily refer to the tendency of people acting honestly, or the classification of the virtue as a desirable trait. Instead, Aristotle purports that the virtue of honesty is predisposed and entrenched in an individual (Bejczy 34). In virtue ethics, therefore, an individual cannot be labeled as honest since he is not cheating, or by spy the honesty in ones dealings. In addi... ... the majority, rights become the greatest good (Troyer 60). closingAristotles virtue ethics argue that morality should be based on an individuals ideal traits that are internalized as opposed to observ ing outward transactions or the consequence of his/her behavior. Kant on the contrary argues that for an individual to be considered morally upright, then his/her actions should be based on duty. Mills maintains that if an action provides long-term pleasures to the majority, then it is morally upright.Works CitedBejczy, Istvan. Virtue ethics in the middle Ages Commentaries on Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 - 1500. Leiden Brill, 2008. Print.Troyer, John. The Classical Utilitarians Bentham and Mill. Indianapolis Hackett Publishers, 2003. Print.Wike, Victoria S. Kant on Happiness in Ethics. Albany Albany State University Press, 1994. Print.