'Fixing Poverty in the Philippines: Mission Impossible Essay\r'

'The Philippines has the second naughtyest pauperism incidence at 40%, in s go forthheastward Asia, fol secondarying East Timor which has 55% (Aldaba, 2005). Also jibe to Aldaba (2005), privation in the Philippines has alship canal been a elevated rural occurrence, in spite of the fact that the exiguity in urban aras is also increasing. More than 2-thirds of the short families in the Philippines live in rural aras. The Family Income and disbursement Survey (FIES) states, found on legitimate pauperisation lines, that poverty incidence in the Philippines has dropped from 49.3% in 1985 to 36.8% in 1997, a downfall of a total of 12.5 component points in 12 years. On the other hand, poverty incidence increased by 3.2 portion from 36.8 percent in 1997 to 40.0 in 2000 (Aldaba, 2005). According to the article scripted by Ted Torres (2013) in The Philippine star, the percentage of Philippines dungeon below the poverty line has re mained al approximately unedited in the pas t six years. The statement was based on the latest poverty data released by the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB). For the first one- half(a) of 2012, the poverty incidence recorded was 27.9 which is slightly little than the 28.8 percent recorded in the first half of 2006, and 28.6 percent in the first half of 2009 and 2011.\r\nThe NSCB opus on the 2012 first semester state of poverty in the Philippines presented that a family with five members can be considered passing poor if it is earning an amount of P5, 458 a month or just enough to place some nutriment on the table. The same family has to earn at least(prenominal) P7, 821 a month to satisfy other primary quill needs such as clothing. Discussion and experience about the game poverty incidence that is peremptory the country is in truth significant. It should be shown to the Filipinos especially to the large number who ar considered living a first-class life. Because of in any case much poverty that gover ns the country, it can be reasonableness out that poverty in the Philippines cannot be divine serviceed anymore. One main reason behind the high poverty incidence in the Philippines is because of the high tribe ontogeny. De Dios (1993) stated that high population growth affects poor househ previous(a)s through a smaller distribution of incomes among them. The Philippines has recorded one of the highest population growth order in Southeast Asia, at 2.6 percent from 1960 to 1994; this rate is higher than Indonesia and Singapore at 2.1 percent and Thailand as 2.3 percent (De Dios, as cited in Aldaba, 2005). De Guzman (1994) notes that crude birth dates has been declining since 1975, but this downfall has been slow, at 35.3 percent in 1973 to 32.8 percent in 1983. De Guzman overly noted that contraceptive prevalence is quite low (30%-40%), and an increasing apportionment of females ar acquire trounce married †factors which may weaken the decline. High population growth c an be pulled down by unchanging use of right family planning. Different giving medication departments atomic number 18 actually conducting talks, meetings, and seminars about Family Planning. These departments are inviting parents and married couples from distinguishable parts of the country to attend the seminars to hear and be open to the use of family planning. But this advocacy seems to be impossible because thither are too galore(postnominal) undisciplined Filipinos who cannot be controlled by the organization. Those undisciplined Filipinos are not open to any advice or suggestions from the hierarchy to improve their management of living. another(prenominal) huge reason for the high population growth in the Philippines is the authorities placement.\r\nAccording to the former Philippines senator, Mr. Francis Pangilinan (n.d.), the government people halt heard never ending complaints about how the government has become a stumbling block for progress in the Philippines . Because of sabotageness and inefficiency, as well as pretermit of vision and direction, the government has become impediment to reforms and unquestionable and real change when it ought to be in the fountainhead of making change happen. It is enough to say that the white-haired methods of governance have not worked and the usual and old style of electing political die harders characterized by substitute and money politics has failed the disappointed the people. The old ways of selecting leaders, the old ways of electing politicians have not resulted in a better nation. The truth is the country is in a mess because of the failure of the government to lead the country (Pangilinan, n.d). But on the other hand, maybe, the â€Å"Tuwid na Daan” of the [NoyNoy] Aquino Administration can pull this country up from its flat and dull persuasion. This advocacy, consisting of many programs that can financial aid improve the Philippines and its people, can be the sight root to poverty. But, according to Pangilinan (n.d), there is still a prominent problem that holds the government from its right leadership †the rottenness. Corruption, float and inefficiency prosper within many situations and yet the government, notwithstanding a few valorous attempts to break this cycle, has by and large failed to change the character of the bureaucracy (Stiftung, 1989). Ubiquitous corruption lead not end unless(prenominal) the Philippine government punish more and punish swiftly and that cannot be done unless the country modernize its Judiciary and proviso it with the necessary resources to do so. Too many politicians fail corruption yet apart from exposes, they have not presented definite steps to address it (Pangilinan, n.d). One way to modernize the Judiciary system is to increase execration rates. According to Pangilinan (n.d), the conviction rate of the Ombudsman in the Sandiganbayan (anti engraft judgeship) for corruption cases is held down at an est imate of less than 20 percent. For every 10 cases filed, less than two end up in conviction; the bide of the cases are the dismissed. No wonder and doubt that most of the people have no fear of committing corrupt acts. Imagine the situation when more than 8 out of 10 corruption cases get absent. This can be sharply compared to the conviction rates in Hong Kong, which is pegged at 79 percent. Meaning, nearly 8 out of 10 are convicted. When more are penalise and punished promptly, respect for the rule of law leave alone return. It is inference of punishment that inculcate fear and respect for the laws. It is the obligation of the Judiciary system to project that the conviction rates are upped. It is also ideal to organized an anti corruption task force, at the highest levels, to monitor spacious cases and to ensure that government resources are equipped to ensure convictions within months from the time of its organization.\r\nThe proverbial big calculate must not be allowed to get away (Pangilinan, n.d). Another way to modernize the Judiciary system is to double its budget. By upping the budget of the Judiciary, to say 2 percent of the 1.17 trillion national budget, we regress come near to the prompt dispensation of justice, the creation of more courts, and expanding of the compensation and benefits of judges, prosecutors and court personnel (Pangilinan, n.d). Corruption cannot be ended. It may be lessened, but not totally ceased. It is because there will forever be government people who will be blinded by the power they got from their position and the huge amount of money they handle. It is a very risky and dangerous work to do corruption acts just for the sake of getting money, but that is the disposition of the government people in the Philippines. One politician cannot end his or her term without even getting a single centavo from the money of the Philippine citizens. Another reason behind the high poverty incidence in the Philippines is the lac k of jobs and employment. Too many Filipino citizens are still unemployed and most of them are having a hard time gambleing jobs. The individual(a) orbit of the government is blamed for lack of jobs in the Philippines. According to Senator Ralph Recto (Recto, as cited in Cabacungan, 2013), â€Å"the job of the insular sector is to create wealth and jobs.\r\nUnfortunately, the private sector in the Philippines does not have a high degree or culture of giving and sharing.” Sen. Recto also added that, maybe, the administration is focusing too much on government, which accounts for only 17 percent of the Gross domesticated Product when it should have its eyes on the 83 percent controlled by the private sector that is creating too many poor people. Recto and Salceda (Recto & adenylic acid; Salceda, as cited in Cabacungan, 2013) said that the social inequality or unjustness was the reason for the increase of unemployment to 7.5 percent or 3.086 one million million in April t his year from 6.9 percent or 2.803 million in the same month in 2012 condescension a record 7.8 percent growth in the economy in the first quarter of 2013. The division of Labor and Employment (DOLE) continuously creates programs to help the Filipinos draw jobs. One way is the online website which encourages the unemployed people to picture resumes online. In the perspective of the employer, it is very easy to find an employee by just visiting the website made by DOLE. The employer can just type in there the position needed in the company and the search results will give the employer the list of the people who are capable of doing the said job. Regardless of the effort of the government to plant more jobs in the Philippines for the Filipinos to be successfully employed, there are still millions of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) who risk their lives in other lands just to get a job and leap their family from poorness. There are mountains of reasons why great poverty is still co lonizing the Philippines. near can be helped but most of it cannot be solved anymore. No matter how the government strives to give jobs to the Filipinos, it will remain as a feed bunk act if the Filipinos are not going to help themselves out of this poverty. It was stated by Mahatma Gandhi that poverty is the score from of violence. It is really the worst and it cannot be helped anymore.\r\nReference make\r\nAldaba, F. (2005). The fight against poverty in SouthEast Asia nongovernmental organization good practices in Cambodia, Indonesia and the Philippines. Stiftung, F. (1989). Poverty and growth in the Philippines. Metro Manila, Philippines: FRESAN Printing. Torres, T. (2013, April 24). Poverty level in Phl unchanged since ’06. The Philippine Star. Retrieved appalling 10, 2013 at http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2013/04/24/934243/poverty-level-phl-unchanged-06 Cabacungan, Gil. (2013, June 12). orphic sector blamed for lack of jobs. Inquirer News. Retrieved fearful 10, 2013 from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/425271/private-sector-blamed-for-lack-of-jobs Pangilinan, F. (n.d). 4 proposed solutions to help fix the Philippines. Senator Francis â€Å"Kiko” Pangilinan: Senator of the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved August 10, 2013 from http://kiko.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=505:4-proposed-solutions-to-he..\r\n'