Realistic Theory Education

Running head : Realistic Theory of EducationA Realist Theory of EducationMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert surround of Author (s ) here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Institution information here] A Realist Theory of EducationThe by philosopher Aristotle once said that all men by reputation desire to know ADDIN EN .CITE Aristotle1924886AristotleW . D RossW . D RossMetaphys ics1070 pages121924OxfordOxford University Press75 (Aristotle , 1924 . In a adept , this desire to know is constituent(prenominal) of what it fashion to be a forgiving being . Two hearty misgivings rustle first gear , Does it field to know and second , why does it egress to know The answer to the first enquire is a matter of distrust . It is simply a matter of super vinegarish sense , so to speak . The answer to the second question however , is no t merely a matter of hunch . It requires critical thinking . It matters to us that we know because knowing has a practical or a pragmatic valueIt is with this legal opinion that cardinal grosbeak may have a fuller understanding of the nerve centre of humane beings acquisition of familiarity . That to seek knowledge is constitutive of what it way to be a human being and that knowledge has a practical or pragmatic value explains why in that location is a felt need to develop theories of command . This had been the principal(prenominal) labour of Philosophy of Education . This has a two-fold task first , it seeks to explicate a realist theory of education along with it philosophical motivations and underpinnings , and second , how a realist theory of education may suitably address significant issues in a well-favored and representative political settingAn initial disambiguation of the term realism is required . In philosophy , realism is a meta natural schooldays of thought . Meaning to say it is concerned wit! h fundamental ontology . Its perfume belief then is the very notion of reality itself . naive realism is the apparent horizon that reality and the objects within it such as trees and stones , etc . exists and that their founding has an independence from a mind that perceives them .

Reality exists singly of human representation , so to speak . lav Searle in his retain The Construction of Social Reality distinguishes between physical and neighborly facts . As Searle contends , the ontology of physical facts is different from the ontology of social facts ADDIN EN .CITE Searle1997666John R SearleThe Construction Of Social Reality256 pages1997Free Press94Engli sh (Searle , 1997 . He offers a encouraging characterization of realism when he writes : Reality exists independently of human representations . This view , called realism . is that though we have mental and linguistic representations of the innovation in the form of beliefs , experiences , statements , and theories there is a reality come to the fore there that is representations ADDIN EN .CITE SearleJohn R . SearleRationality and naturalism : What Is at stake ?DaedalusDaedalus3 (Searle , 1993 ,. 60 . Furthermore , as John Dolhenty contends : Knowledge is the baring of Reality . It is not a origin of our mind . The stripping of Reality is initially made by our external sense organs and then more utterly by our agreement ADDIN EN .CITE Dolhenty5543John DolhentyA BRIEF ON THE without end PHILOSOPHYAugust...If you want to pound a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper. com

If you want to get a full essay, vis! it our page: write my paper